Feed on
Posts
Comments

It is what it is

From Anglican Samizdat:

“It is what it is”.

The depth of its iniquity lays not only in its inane tautology, but in the diversionary tactic that normally accompanies its use. You can see a prime specimen here, perpetrated by Primate Fred Hiltz. In this case, the church is obviously breaking the moratorium on same-sex blessings because they are actually occurring. But since the House of Bishops has not officially sanctioned them (nor has it censured those who conduct them), the blatant contradiction between claiming the moratorium is not broken – while brazenly breaking it – becomes an “it is what it is” phenomenon, designed to divert attention from the crass lie.

Archbishop Fred Hiltz, primate of the Anglican Church of Canada, noted that in Canada, several dioceses either allow same-sex blessing rites or are considering it, subject to a decision arising from this General Synod. Despite these developments, he said, the Canadian House of Bishops’ October 2008 statement still stands. It affirms a continued moratorium on same-sex blessings while recognizing that it would be difficult for some dioceses to implement it.

“We’ve not revisited or altered that statement as a House,” noted Archbishop Hiltz. “It is what it is.” And while the landscape has changed, he said, “what we’re keeping is a plan for us to continue to walk together and pray together.”

4 Responses to “It is what it is”

  1. 1
    Ellie M. says:

    Well, ANiC also “affirms a continued moratorium” on border crossings “while recognizing that it would be difficult for some to implement it”. Two can play at that game, Fred.

  2. 2
    Daryle says:

    Cross border interventions blatently occured in the first centuries of the church, to combat many heresies, Arian among them.

    Canadian Indiginous Bishop Mark McDonald is in this cross-border situation, and he points out that Bishop Walter Jones was formerly in this position as well, and without repercussion or disciplinary action.

    Nice double standard.

    This response to revisionist action appears quite godly.
    Besides, cross-border interventions have come at the (insistent) request of orthodox peoples under seige, or assault, by home-grown revisionist aggressiveness.

    Innovators are good at salivating their outrage, but these actions are RESPONSES to other situations.

    I dislike the small of hypocrisy!

  3. 3
    Daryle says:

    … that would be “the smell of hypocrisy”

  4. 4
    Gordon Arthur says:

    It is also fairly small minded…
    :-)

Leave a Reply