Invite from Rome ‘offensive,’ says Anglican bishop
Nov 12th, 2009 by David
From the Star
Head of conservative Anglican group critical of Pope’s message, but some lay members warm to the idea.
ST. CATHARINES–An invitation from Rome to join the Catholic Church is “offensive in the extreme,” the head of a breakaway group of Canadian Anglicans says.“Apart from being an intrusion at the very highest levels of one major church into the internal affairs of another, under the guise of being ecumenical, this invitation offers very little that is new,” Bishop Don Harvey, moderator of the Anglican Network in Canada, told the group’s annual synod Thursday morning.
The Network left the Anglican Church of Canada last year to join the conservative Anglican Church in North America in a dispute over liberal versus conservative interpretations of the Bible that came to a head over gay marriage and clergy.Then, last month, Pope Benedict XVI invited dissatisfied Anglicans to join the Catholic church, but keep their Anglican rituals. Details of the invitation, which allows Anglican clergy to remain married, but not become bishops, were released this week.
In his official charge to the synod this morning, Harvey took offence to the invitation, saying it overstates the overlap between the two churches’ beliefs. He also took a swipe at the media.
“I find the words in the official joint communique referring to ‘the Catholic Church and the Anglican Tradition’ offensive in the extreme and reporters who suggested that this may be a solution to the Network’s needs are not really aware of what we truly profess,” he said.
The Network has long maintained that the disputes over gay marriage and clergy were a symptom of a larger disagreement over a perceived liberal drift by mainstream Anglicanism.
Harvey said the Pope’s invitation was neither helpful nor welcome.
“This is not the way to foster good ecumenical dialogue,” he said in his charge.
Both Harvey and Archbishop Fred Hiltz, primate of the Anglican Church of Canada, have said they do not expect many to take up the Pope’s offer.
Despite Harvey’s misgivings, several lay members of the Network at the synod told the Star on Monday they took comfort from the invitation.
“I was absolutely elated,” Phillip Wiebe of Vancouver said Monday.
Wiebe saw the Pope’s move as evidence that the Network has support for its conservative interpretation of the Bible.
David Jenkins of Oakville said he likes the Catholic Church’s opposition to abortion and homosexual rights.
“From that point of view, being Catholic is pretty tempting to me,” he said.
He would not switch, however, if it meant agreeing to Catholic tenets of the infallibility of the pope, the role of the Virgin Mary and transubstantiation, or the Catholic belief that the bread and wine of communion become the body and blood of Jesus.
Joyce Lee of Vancouver said she hopes that all orthodox Christian churches will one day join together, and that the Pope’s invitation is a first step toward that.
“It’s a sign and encouragement that there’s a home for you if you need one,” she said.
Jessica Stilwell, 18, who hopes to study English and religion at McGill University next year, said that after years of division in the Anglican church, it is heartening to be invited to join another church – even if the invitation is not taken up.
Harvey did not agree.
“It would be nice to be invited to the party, but on equal terms.”
Just in case anyone is wondering, no, I did not say “homosexual rights”.

While I’m sure everyone knew this would never be a viable solution for ANiC/ACNA, I think the response here may have been too harsh. As Bishop Don himself said, “This is not the way to foster good ecumenical dialogue.”
As for the Star’s misquoting David, all I can say is wow. It’s amazing how easily the secular media can transform a complex theological position into an accusation of opposing people’s rights.
I shouldn’t have told him that I read the National Post.
I think that this is the time to stand with our Moderator if there ever was a time.
The Star reporters can get a little . . . creative . . . when they paraphrase. Essentially, they wrote what they wish you had said.
You probably shouldn’t have said that you couldn’t adhere to outlandish Catholic beliefs such as the fairness and readability of the Toronto Star.
#2 David, heh, you are such a bad man.
I don’t find the Catholic invitation to be offensive, at the same time I wouldn’t be taking it up becasue of the issues that David brings up. Anyway, I’m pretty sure you’d end up going from the frying pan into the fire.
David I’m agahst - It’s the Toronto Star for cryin out loud!!
If the Romans were interested in unity there are agencies well entrenched for moving such agenda forward. This is grandstanding plain and simple. But we have Anglicans that will be duped or should I say have been duped uh actually, maybe I should say could be duped. In any case Duped is the optimum word and it stinks.
The Traditional Anglican Communion instigated the conversation with Rome, it actually has little to do with anyone else. (Not even the Toronto Star.)
TAC might have instigated the conversation, but the invitation was to all Anglicans. I’m with Bishop Harvey on this one.