<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is TEC Still A Christian Church?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anglicanessentials.ca/wordpress/index.php/2009/07/15/is-tec-still-a-christian-church/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anglicanessentials.ca/wordpress/index.php/2009/07/15/is-tec-still-a-christian-church/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:46:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.anglicanessentials.ca/wordpress/index.php/2009/07/15/is-tec-still-a-christian-church/comment-page-1/#comment-162990</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anglicanessentials.ca/wordpress/index.php/2009/07/15/is-tec-still-a-christian-church/#comment-162990</guid>
		<description>And to respond to the question in the headline, the brief answer is &quot;no&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And to respond to the question in the headline, the brief answer is &#8220;no&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.anglicanessentials.ca/wordpress/index.php/2009/07/15/is-tec-still-a-christian-church/comment-page-1/#comment-162988</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anglicanessentials.ca/wordpress/index.php/2009/07/15/is-tec-still-a-christian-church/#comment-162988</guid>
		<description>[#7],

I think the power struggle aspect is partly true but I also think that the TEC bishops genuinely believe they are being &quot;prophetic&quot; and that the rest of the Anglican world will come around to their viewpoint eventually.

The same sentiments are expressed in Canada: a number of Canadian bishops have declared that they are being &quot;prophetic&quot; by proceeding with SSBs. I remember a number of years ago when Ralph Spence was bishop of Niagara, he declared confidently that this fuss would blow over and the recalcitrant fundamentalists would come to see things his way. Not sure whether he is still that confident.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[#7],</p>
<p>I think the power struggle aspect is partly true but I also think that the TEC bishops genuinely believe they are being &#8220;prophetic&#8221; and that the rest of the Anglican world will come around to their viewpoint eventually.</p>
<p>The same sentiments are expressed in Canada: a number of Canadian bishops have declared that they are being &#8220;prophetic&#8221; by proceeding with SSBs. I remember a number of years ago when Ralph Spence was bishop of Niagara, he declared confidently that this fuss would blow over and the recalcitrant fundamentalists would come to see things his way. Not sure whether he is still that confident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.anglicanessentials.ca/wordpress/index.php/2009/07/15/is-tec-still-a-christian-church/comment-page-1/#comment-162983</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anglicanessentials.ca/wordpress/index.php/2009/07/15/is-tec-still-a-christian-church/#comment-162983</guid>
		<description>I just re read the motion.  It wasn&#039;t even afirming the uniqueness of Christ, it was asking the bishops to state plainly what they believe.  It is even weaker than I thought at first reading, and still it was defeated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just re read the motion.  It wasn&#8217;t even afirming the uniqueness of Christ, it was asking the bishops to state plainly what they believe.  It is even weaker than I thought at first reading, and still it was defeated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMPisAnglican</title>
		<link>http://www.anglicanessentials.ca/wordpress/index.php/2009/07/15/is-tec-still-a-christian-church/comment-page-1/#comment-162979</link>
		<dc:creator>AMPisAnglican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anglicanessentials.ca/wordpress/index.php/2009/07/15/is-tec-still-a-christian-church/#comment-162979</guid>
		<description>This is nothing short of a power struggle.  TEC is basically telling ABC and CoE that TEC is charge, and everyone else had better get in line.
Simply put.  TEC refuses to be told anything, but expects everyone else to follow them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is nothing short of a power struggle.  TEC is basically telling ABC and CoE that TEC is charge, and everyone else had better get in line.<br />
Simply put.  TEC refuses to be told anything, but expects everyone else to follow them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellie M.</title>
		<link>http://www.anglicanessentials.ca/wordpress/index.php/2009/07/15/is-tec-still-a-christian-church/comment-page-1/#comment-162967</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellie M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anglicanessentials.ca/wordpress/index.php/2009/07/15/is-tec-still-a-christian-church/#comment-162967</guid>
		<description>Well, they did resolve to ban bottled water.  I&#039;m sure there&#039;s a Biblical verse about that somewhere. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, they did resolve to ban bottled water.  I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s a Biblical verse about that somewhere. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy</title>
		<link>http://www.anglicanessentials.ca/wordpress/index.php/2009/07/15/is-tec-still-a-christian-church/comment-page-1/#comment-162944</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anglicanessentials.ca/wordpress/index.php/2009/07/15/is-tec-still-a-christian-church/#comment-162944</guid>
		<description>Maybe it didn&#039;t pass because people couldn&#039;t quite figure out what the resolution was saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it didn&#8217;t pass because people couldn&#8217;t quite figure out what the resolution was saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.anglicanessentials.ca/wordpress/index.php/2009/07/15/is-tec-still-a-christian-church/comment-page-1/#comment-162941</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anglicanessentials.ca/wordpress/index.php/2009/07/15/is-tec-still-a-christian-church/#comment-162941</guid>
		<description>And frankly, I wouldn&#039;t care one way or another if they did - it would really be none of my business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And frankly, I wouldn&#8217;t care one way or another if they did &#8211; it would really be none of my business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pauline</title>
		<link>http://www.anglicanessentials.ca/wordpress/index.php/2009/07/15/is-tec-still-a-christian-church/comment-page-1/#comment-162934</link>
		<dc:creator>Pauline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anglicanessentials.ca/wordpress/index.php/2009/07/15/is-tec-still-a-christian-church/#comment-162934</guid>
		<description>Actually Islam, Judaism, Jehovah Witnesses are exclusionary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually Islam, Judaism, Jehovah Witnesses are exclusionary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awsdf</title>
		<link>http://www.anglicanessentials.ca/wordpress/index.php/2009/07/15/is-tec-still-a-christian-church/comment-page-1/#comment-162932</link>
		<dc:creator>awsdf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anglicanessentials.ca/wordpress/index.php/2009/07/15/is-tec-still-a-christian-church/#comment-162932</guid>
		<description>You wouldn&#039;t like it if the Islamic congress passed such a motion, or Jehovah&#039;s Witnesses.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wouldn&#8217;t like it if the Islamic congress passed such a motion, or Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Wirrell</title>
		<link>http://www.anglicanessentials.ca/wordpress/index.php/2009/07/15/is-tec-still-a-christian-church/comment-page-1/#comment-162916</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Wirrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anglicanessentials.ca/wordpress/index.php/2009/07/15/is-tec-still-a-christian-church/#comment-162916</guid>
		<description>This proves apostasy has no boundaries and it is worse than tragic to see the church losing – if it has not already lost – any claim to be a Christian church.  It is true that Scripture says the gates of hell will not prevail against it.  However, that promise does not apply to a church that willingly and deliberately denies the uniqueness of Christ and/or willingly approves and even seeks to bless activity that Scripture clearly calls sin.  In the TEC and the ACoC we have apostate leadership that has come to believe they are superior to God and that God’s word is subject to their approval. The time has long since past for any orthodox members to call these apostates to account.  We need to pray for their conversion and repentance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This proves apostasy has no boundaries and it is worse than tragic to see the church losing – if it has not already lost – any claim to be a Christian church.  It is true that Scripture says the gates of hell will not prevail against it.  However, that promise does not apply to a church that willingly and deliberately denies the uniqueness of Christ and/or willingly approves and even seeks to bless activity that Scripture clearly calls sin.  In the TEC and the ACoC we have apostate leadership that has come to believe they are superior to God and that God’s word is subject to their approval. The time has long since past for any orthodox members to call these apostates to account.  We need to pray for their conversion and repentance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.anglicanessentials.ca/wordpress/index.php/2009/07/15/is-tec-still-a-christian-church/feed/ ) in 0.39242 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 10:41 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 11:41 pm UTC -->
