Waterloo Record article on Diocese of Huron’s same sex blessings vote here. H/T Stand Firm and J. Muirhead in the comments.
Waterloo Record Article
May 24th, 2008 by Kate
One Response to “Waterloo Record Article”
Leave a Reply
-
About
There are 1,683 Posts and 16,287 Comments so far. Pages
Recent Comments
- Kate on New lawsuit against Grenville Christian College
- Frank Wirrell on Gay minister resigns following negative comments
- Jack S. Pratt on New lawsuit against Grenville Christian College
- Jack S. Pratt on Gay minister resigns following negative comments
- crowshire on Gay minister resigns following negative comments
- crowshire on Gay minister resigns following negative comments
- crowshire on Gay minister resigns following negative comments
- Dave M on New lawsuit against Grenville Christian College
- AMPisAnglican on Archbishops suggest ‘open-ended engagement’ with breakaway Anglicans
- Marilyn on Archbishops suggest ‘open-ended engagement’ with breakaway Anglicans
Categories
- ACoC General Synod 2007
- ACoC General Synod 2010
- Anglican Artistic Moments
- Anglican Church in North America
- Anglican Church of Canada
- Anglican Communion
- Anglican Communion Alliance
- Anglican Crisis
- Anglican Essentials
- Anglican Network in Canada
- ANiC Prayer Calendar
- ANiC Synod 2010
- ANiC Synod 2011
- Church Year
- Common Cause
- ELCIC
- Just for Fun
- Prayer
- Uncategorised
-
Blog roll
- A Reasonable Faith
- Anglican Communion Alliance
- Anglican Communion Institute
- Anglican Essentials
- Anglican Essentials Calgary
- Anglican Essentials Federation
- Anglican Mainstream
- Anglican Network in Canada
- Anglican Samizdat
- ANiC Parishes
- Felix Hominum
- GENEralities
- Lent & Beyond
- Nova Scotia Scott
- Stand Firm
- The Age to Come
- The Hairy Eyeball
- The Scriptorium
- TitusOneNine
- Under Ethiopia
- VirtueOnline
Archives
Meta
-
“…to bless the duly solemnized and registered civil marriages between same-gender couples, where at least one party is baptized . . . .”
I really wonder why they are so concerned with one partner being baptized. What is this, some kind of rule or something? Rules are unfair and discriminatory and hurtful, aren’t they?
Besides, James 2:10 says that if one breaks just one part of the law, one is guilty of breaking it all, so what’s the difference. But… Oh, I forgot… that’s in the Bible and we don’t really pay much attention to that any more, do we?