Comments on: JI Packer threatened with suspension

By: Daryle

Daryle — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:26:57 +0000

Thanks Gerry.

I meant that IF we could edit our own work, it might make this forum a bit more ‘user-friendly’. But hey, I’m the “new-bie”.

When in Rome…

By: Gerry O'Brien

Gerry O'Brien — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 16:57:47 +0000

Daryle: Hey, wouldn’t that be something if all of us could edit!!
You could post and if I didn’t like it, I’d just change it….yikes.
I think Kate, Scott and Peter do wonderfully….oh, the odd thing skips past them, but then, we can always add to that thread a recommendation for some editing and they do it….they’re great.

By: Kate

Kate — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 11:30:52 +0000

Commenters can’t edit here. Only Peter, Scott and I can.

By: Daryle

Daryle — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 02:44:14 +0000

Thanks Gerry,
The post, as written, HAS been adjusted. Also, I do not know how to ‘edit’ here. For now, lets call it “seriously messed up”! Perhaps a moderator can fix this. (I did edit it a bit. –Kate) And yes, some time ago, I lost all patience with error, and with the leadership that both spawned and perpetuated it.

By: Gerry O'Brien

Gerry O'Brien — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 18:31:18 +0000

Daryle: I know that I am blunt but not to your extent. I would think that your post is one that could be partially edited…..

By: Daryle

Daryle — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 04:29:51 +0000

Sorry for this, but this bishop is seriously ****** up!

By: Warren

Warren — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:22:41 +0000

Just spotted on an evangelical group blog (the owner is ordained in the Southern Baptist Convention, and the other contributors are from many backgrounds):

I hope that one day I, too, can be threatened by Ingham (the Anglican bishop threatening Packer). I�d like to tell you what I really think of him, but I�m torn. On the one hand, I don�t want to speak too outrageously about someone in a leadership role in the church. On the other hand, I�m reasonably certain he�s not a Christian at all, but actually evil, and I mean that in every sense of the word.

For now I�ll just say that this is unsurprising, given that the church Packer�s attends just voted to leave the Anglican Church of Canada.

By: David Jenkins

David Jenkins — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:03:23 +0000

John K: The ACoC seem to be living in another age; perhaps even another dimension. Their talent for PR appears to be similar to their ability to evangelize.

By: John K

John K — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:27:47 +0000

…Mike Ingham isn�t even worthy to carry Jim Packers jock strap!

Is this a paraphrase of Mark 1:7?
Seriously, this has got to be a PR disaster for Ingham. Surely it will backfire!

By: Kate

Kate — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:37:56 +0000

Alan, you obviously know me – who are you?? Or have I just used the “I’m glad I wasn’t drinking coffee when I read that” line a few too many times?